DAILY BULLETIN 6 - a | |
| Friday, February 13, 1998 | Editors: Eric Kokish, Richard Colker Special thanks for Internet edition: Mr. N. W. Pedersen |
FIRST QUARTER (Boards 1-16): POLAND-USA started with a 0.8 IMP carryover advantage, which meant that if the match ended in a tie, the visitors would win. We will ignore the carryover in the narrative.
in the Open Room forced a
direct decision on Tadashi Imakura, who could hardly withhold his
heart support with such a good fit for the majors. Masayuki Ino took a
sensible shot at slam, which proved to be a good bet after Gawrys led
a diamond rather than a club. Ino ruffed and would have succeeded
easily had he crossed to the K to finesse against the king of hearts
(intending to later take a ruffing finesse in spades), but instead he
played the ace of hearts, intending to go about his business in
straightforward fashion if trumps were two-one. When Gawrys showed
out, Ino had a control problem. He played a second trump, which Marcin
Lesniewski took to play a third. Ino won in hand and judged well to
run the nine of spades, but with the queen having three little
friends, he was a trick short. One down; minus 100.
At the other table, Hiroshi Hisatomi's slow route to 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
J against Imakura's
4 . Gawrys would have beaten the contract easily enough had he taken
two rounds of diamonds, cashed the ace of trumps (important, lest
declarer cash two high spades before playing a trump . . . as he might
well do), and played a third diamond. When he took his two diamond
winners, Imakura followed four-queen, so perhaps Gawrys had some doubt
about the location of the 10. He cashed the the ace of trumps, and
switched to the J. Now dummy's third spade went on the 10 and
Imakura was plus 620.
At the other table, Lev's artificial limit raise caught Hisatomi with
an unlucky hand for his methods (it looks as if a double of 3
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
, but
Gawrys-Lesniewski had been willing to stop in 3 , so they were doubled
by Ino. Who had perhaps overbid slightly at his third turn.
At both tables South led the
In the Open Room, Ino cashed the
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
, but only
Lesniewski thought he could afford to do so at
the prevailing vulnerability. The overcall had
the effect of keeping Ino-Imakura out of 3NT,
but they could no longer make any game. Five
clubs had to go one down, with two fast
spades and one slow diamond to lose; minus
50.
In the Closed Room, where Teramoto did not overcall, Lev was even money to make his 3NT contract, and I must confess that I would have led a diamond honour from Hiroshi's hand. Which might explain why he is still playing and I am still typing. He led a spade and the defenders cashed five tricks for one down; minus 50. No swing after all.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Both North/South pairs did well on Board 10,
reaching 4
Lev ruffed, cashed the
Ino got much more involved. When he ruffed the
second spade, he led the
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||